![]() The convention is that an aim is usually written using an infinitive verb – that is, it’s a to + action. It is ambitious, but not beyond possibility. It signals what and/or where you aspire to be by the end. ![]() ![]() (1) The aim is about what you hope to do, your overall intention in the project. So taking this what-how as a kind of loose and sloppy differentiation between the two, the rough rule of thumb with aims and objectives is generally that: Or we might say – and it is what is commonly said about aims and objectives – the aim is the what of the research, and the objective is the how. But, once past the antiquated expression, you might discern that the difference between the two is somehow related to a hope or ambition (aim) versus a material action (objective). Now who actually speaks like this? The fact that these definitions are offered in this very formal language doesn’t help clarify matters. On the other hand an objective is to do with achieving an object, it’s about actions, “pertaining to that whose delineation is known”. An aim is “something intended or desired to be obtained by one’s efforts”. My desk dictionary says that an aim is to do with giving direction. And the difference is something I’ve recently been asked about, so I’ve decided to post something of an answer.ĭictionaries are only vaguely helpful when thinking about aims and objectives. The what’s-the-difference question can have you going around in ever smaller unproductive circles if you can’t figure out a way to differentiate between the two things. What”s the difference between the two?Īn aims-objectives confusion might arise when you are writing thesis proposal and the introductory thesis chapter. You’re ready, you’re aimed, and now you have to fire off the objectives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |